Why Figma, Notion, and Miro Weren’t Enough "The Painful Truth Behind Creative Feedback"

#Insight
#Product
Markhub Interface

We Used to be a Design Agency.

We weren’t building SaaS, and we certainly weren’t thinking about AI. One day, a client asked us to design a poster. We completed it, revised it based on their feedback, and sent it over.

Then came the reply:



“This isn’t what we meant.”



But they did give us feedback. And we did follow it. Still, the result wasn’t what they expected.

Eventually, they took the time to open PowerPoint, add their own comments, and send it back again. It felt like that frustrating moment of:

“Why did we end up here when we were just trying to help?”

That moment stuck with us. There was clearly a broken link between conversation and outcome.



I’d seen the same thing back in school. I studied architecture, and professors would give verbal feedback all the time. But where did that feedback go? What exactly was I supposed to fix?

There was rarely a clear, lasting record.

Good feedback almost never turned into actionable to-dos.



Yes, there are tools.

Figma, Miro, Notion, Slack, Google Docs... But tools alone weren’t the answer.

They didn’t solve this problem.

What we needed wasn’t just collaboration. It was a way to make feedback flow naturally into execution.



So we built Markhub.

A space where conversations turn directly into tasks. Where chats become documents, tickets, action. Where feedback isn’t lost, it becomes part of the system.

We call it:

Conversation to Execution, Instantly



If this kind of frustration sounds familiar, give Markhub a try.

It’s time to stop letting important conversations disappear.

👉https://www.youtube.com/shorts/a0ayxvRj8hE



✅ Keywords

  • miro alternative
  • feedback management tool
  • figma communication problem
  • creative feedback system
  • design agency workflow
  • conversation to execution
  • feedback to todo
  • Notion vs markhub





Written by DongYoon Shin

Founder CEO, Markhub